Virtual CSSERGPI review / Executive Summaries
Each prototype uses the same current VCSSERG v1 evidence, exactly one dense key figure, and links toward deeper reporting. They differ in hierarchy, density, and reading sequence.
Bee's recommendation: use A as the default because it maps most directly to the five-minute reading contract and remains robust when a figure cannot carry the page alone.
A / Evidence brief
A conventional research briefing: question and status, the key figure, then a compact two-column findings list.
Best for: broad audiences and predictable five-minute reading.
Tradeoff: visually familiar rather than distinctive.
B / Research poster
A dashboard-like poster: the key figure dominates one side while findings and limits form a compact rail.
Best for: results with a genuinely explanatory figure.
Tradeoff: weak figures will leave the page feeling empty.
C / Field notes
A narrative notebook: the question, evidence, interpretation, and next decision unfold as dated entries.
Best for: provisional or infrastructure-heavy projects.
Tradeoff: comparison across findings takes more effort.