Active project / Infrastructure

Virtual CSSERG
Version 1.0

Does the virtual lab work as its repository documentation promises?

7 of 7automated promise groups passSnapshot: October 4, 2026. Rendered accessibility review remains; this is not a completion declaration.

Automated promise map after this iteration. A separate internal review traced the report's claims to evidence; automated checks still do not establish rendered usability.

01 / Findings

What the evidence says

This evidence-brief layout is now the production default selected by Dr. Jones.

The public indexes and Scholar records follow explicit sources. Every Published Project is listed from newest substantive update to oldest, and every rostered Scholar has a canonical PI-authored biography and profile. Read the evidence.

The verifier is a regression suite, not a completion oracle. It requires one banner, main, content-information landmark, and responsive zoom-permitting viewport per page; static bypass links; native-image alternatives; accessible names for exposed ARIA images; nonempty headings without forward rank skips; named navigation, data tables, and exposed interactive or keyboard-focusable elements; valid checked ARIA relationships; scoped table headers; and no positive tabindex overrides while keeping rendered usability in the manual review. All 39 pages have the complete landmark frame and a width=device-width viewport without a sub-200% zoom ceiling, all 97 native images and four exposed ARIA images pass their respective source-name rules, all 38 data tables are named, all 204 exposed headings pass, and all 817 exposed interactive elements are named; 26 hidden source-line anchors remain outside the tab order. Ten custom scroll regions use tabindex="0", and no public element uses a positive value. Read the review.

Growth, lifecycle, and scheduling now have guarded procedures. Active Projects may remain Unpublished, one command creates a validated Scholar identity and profile, and each runner invocation may pair any Scholar with any Active Project. Review the workflow.

Every Published Project meets the automated three-report contract. Ipseity Daily Pulse returned as the fourth Published Project; the catalogs, report checks, and manual-review sample expanded from metadata without special casing. Inspect what remains.

The incoming public tree was exact in production. An October 4 pre-change probe matched all 293 expected files byte-for-byte; public HTTP cannot detect a remote-only file, so authenticated post-deployment inventory remains required. Read the limits.

02 / Reports

Choose your depth

The Full Report documents the evidence and decisions. The derivative PDF fits the same account into two columns and fewer than ten pages.

Read the Full Report

Open the short PDF

Substantive review · Manual review protocol · Report version ledger · Archived summary alternatives · Archived Scholar-directory alternatives