Ryerson Project Ryerson Project

Ryerson Project Item 139

I personally believe it will be possible to build Artificial General Intelligence. (Artificial General Intelligence refers to a computer system that could learn to complete any intellectual task that a human being could.)

American adults' average (mean) response was 6.31 on a scale of 0 (Disagree) to 10 (Agree). 1,377 responses have been collected (so far) from 2026-05-11 to 2026-10-07.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean6.31
Median7.00
Standard deviation2.79
N1,377
Standard error0.075

All-Time Distribution

Response 0: 77 Response 1: 31 Response 2: 57 Response 3: 57 Response 4: 79 Response 5: 172 Response 6: 183 Response 7: 198 Response 8: 202 Response 9: 113 Response 10: 208 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 208 Agreement (0 = maximum disagreement, 10 = maximum agreement) Count

Comparison to Other Items

Based on all-time mean agreement, this item ranks 73 out of 139 qualifying items and is at the 47.8 percentile.

Qualifying items have 100 or more total observations. Higher means indicate more agreement and therefore a higher rank.

Monthly Trend

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0% 50% 100% 0 5 10 2026-05 response 0: 4.4% 2026-05 response 1: 2.4% 2026-05 response 2: 3.6% 2026-05 response 3: 3.6% 2026-05 response 4: 8.4% 2026-05 response 5: 8.8% 2026-05 response 6: 11.2% 2026-05 response 7: 17.7% 2026-05 response 8: 16.1% 2026-05 response 9: 10.8% 2026-05 response 10: 12.9% 2026-06 response 0: 5.2% 2026-06 response 1: 1.4% 2026-06 response 2: 3.9% 2026-06 response 3: 4.7% 2026-06 response 4: 5.5% 2026-06 response 5: 15.7% 2026-06 response 6: 15.5% 2026-06 response 7: 13.5% 2026-06 response 8: 13.5% 2026-06 response 9: 7.5% 2026-06 response 10: 13.5% 2026-07 response 0: 6.1% 2026-07 response 1: 4.3% 2026-07 response 2: 5.9% 2026-07 response 3: 4.3% 2026-07 response 4: 4.5% 2026-07 response 5: 9.9% 2026-07 response 6: 13.1% 2026-07 response 7: 14.4% 2026-07 response 8: 13.9% 2026-07 response 9: 8.5% 2026-07 response 10: 15.2% 2026-08 response 0: 6.6% 2026-08 response 1: 1.9% 2026-08 response 2: 3.3% 2026-08 response 3: 3.3% 2026-08 response 4: 6.2% 2026-08 response 5: 11.8% 2026-08 response 6: 11.8% 2026-08 response 7: 13.3% 2026-08 response 8: 19.0% 2026-08 response 9: 6.2% 2026-08 response 10: 16.6% 2026-09 response 0: 4.7% 2026-09 response 1: 0.0% 2026-09 response 2: 2.7% 2026-09 response 3: 4.7% 2026-09 response 4: 3.3% 2026-09 response 5: 16.7% 2026-09 response 6: 13.3% 2026-09 response 7: 13.3% 2026-09 response 8: 12.0% 2026-09 response 9: 8.0% 2026-09 response 10: 21.3% 2026-10 response 0: 10.0% 2026-10 response 1: 0.0% 2026-10 response 2: 3.3% 2026-10 response 3: 3.3% 2026-10 response 4: 10.0% 2026-10 response 5: 20.0% 2026-10 response 6: 16.7% 2026-10 response 7: 10.0% 2026-10 response 8: 10.0% 2026-10 response 9: 6.7% 2026-10 response 10: 10.0% May 2026 Jun 2026 Jul 2026 Aug 2026 Sep 2026 Oct 2026 Observation month Percent of responses Monthly mean

Observed Trend

Observations suggest unchanging agreement over the observed period, from 2026-05-11 to 2026-10-07. The estimated change over that period is 0.126 points on a 0 to 10 scale. Regression results place a 95% confidence interval around that observed-period change of [-0.435, 0.687].
Regression table

The daily slope annualized over 365.25 days is 0.309 points per year, with a 95% confidence interval of [-1.066, 1.684]. This short-window annualized number is provided for reference, but the observed-period change above is the primary trend estimate.

Call:
lm(formula = response_value ~ days_since_start, data = model_data)

Residuals:
    Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
-6.3848 -1.3357  0.6609  1.7311  3.7404 

Coefficients:
                  Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept)      6.2587235  0.1386387  45.144   <2e-16 ***
days_since_start 0.0008458  0.0019189   0.441    0.659    
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 2.787 on 1375 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared:  0.0001413,	Adjusted R-squared:  -0.0005859 
F-statistic: 0.1943 on 1 and 1375 DF,  p-value: 0.6594